Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Drug Tests for Cops?

Random drug-testing for police might be the start of a great idea.
While most drug testing is stupid and counter-productive, in some instances --like flight crews -- there is some justification.

In the case of police, we allow them to carry arms and not only drive, to to engage in hot pursuit while driving. It would seem that the public safety rationale is present.

In addition, as parties to drug arrests, police are exposed to very high levels of temptation, being around large quantities of unaccounted-for drugs and money. Unfortunately, the record shows that high numbers of them succumb to that temptation. So we also have a history of abuse, satisfying the Supreme Court.

We expect our police, as armed enforcers of the law with a very high level of discretion, to be paragons of legal behavior. It just ain't so. Major police corruption is always an result of prohibition laws.

Maybe instead of random testing, we should test all of them at least trwice each shift.and on days off as well.

The other major result of corruption is money. Is there a test for that as well? Any officer exceeding the lower test limit would be suspended and investigated.

Come to think about it, is there a test for testostrone...

Awired, crooked cop is a much greater danger to society than a high school quarterback who got stoned last week.

(I'm only about half sarcastic here)
----- Original Message -----
From: "MAPNews" <owner-mapnews@mapinc.org>
To: <mapnews@mapinc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:45 PM
Subject: MN: US PA: Random Drug Testing For Cops A Cloudy Issue
> Newshawk: Herb> Pubdate: Sun, 11 Mar 2007> Source: Times-Tribune, The (Scranton PA)> Copyright: 2007 Townnews.com> Contact: Letters@TimesShamrock.com> Website: http://www.thetimes-tribune.com> Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4440> Author: Matthew Kemeny, Staff Writer> Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Test)> > RANDOM DRUG TESTING FOR COPS A CLOUDY ISSUE> > The recent arrest of a Scranton police officer for allegedly selling > drugs while on duty has sparked concerns about whether the city > should, or even can, randomly test its officers.> > Mark Conway, 36, of 1012 Maple St., was arrested March 1 after > Lackawanna County detectives allegedly found five OxyContin pills and > 33 methadone tablets in his patrol car. A confidential informant > tipped authorities that Officer Conway was allegedly addicted to > heroin for more than a year. The informant also said he had bought > heroin from Officer Conway about 10 times, according to an affidavit.> > Shortly after the officer's arrest, Scranton Public Safety Director > Ray Hayes was quoted as saying he'd like to see random drug testing > for police officers as part of the next labor contract. The current > police contract was signed in May 1999 and expired in 2002. The city > and police cannot negotiate a new contract until all outstanding > police arbitrations are settled.> > While the current contract states Scranton police officers can only > be tested for drugs based on "reasonable suspicion," some say the > contract language is ambiguous and already allows for random drug > testing. The contract does require mandatory drug testing on officers > in the drug enforcement unit.> > "I think it's pretty clear... the contract allows for random drug > testing," said Ann Marie Stulgis, police union president. She recalls > a committee being set up shortly after the contract was approved to > solicit bids from lab companies to perform the testing.> > "But it was never implemented," she said. "I don't know why."> > Former Police Officer John O'Shea was union president when the last > labor contract was approved. He retired in 2002.> > "It's in our contract," he said bluntly, after being asked if the > city has the ability to randomly drug test its officers. "It came > from the (officers). They wanted it."> > However he couldn't say why it was never implemented.> > "That's an administrative deal," he said. "It costs money."> > However, Mr. Hayes, Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty and Scranton Human > Resources Director Lisa Moran insist random drug testing is not > included in the current contract.> > "We recognize that we really need a comprehensive drug policy," Mr. > Hayes, who started as public safety director in 2002, said. "And > although this policy here that we have in place is a first step -- > they had nothing before that -- you really need a total comprehensive > drug policy that includes random testing as well as testing for cause."> > Officer Conway's arrest underscores the need for a random drug > testing policy, he added.> > Since May 1999, the department has sent just one officer for testing, > based on "reasonable suspicion," Mr. Hayes said. That suspicion > turned out to be false, he said. Despite the differences in semantics > of the contract, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Doherty, Mrs. Moran and Ms. Stulgis > support random drug testing for Scranton police.> > Mr. Hayes even went as far as to invite Ms. Stulgis to sit down with > him on Monday and hash out a plan.> > "The city would like to make that modification, if the union is in > agreement, so that we could initiate random drug testing immediately," he said.> > Throughout the state, policies vary on random drug testing on police officers.> > The Jessup Police Department, for instance, does not have random drug > testing and only does pre-employment drug testing for officers. > Police Chief Patrick Kane said the borough is considering random drug > testing, especially after one of its off-duty police officers was > arrested for allegedly stealing a rifle, marijuana and hypodermic > needles from their evidence room.> > Last February, Officer Robert Santarelli was charged with burglary, > theft, receiving stolen property and possession of marijuana and drug > paraphernalia. Officer Santarelli, who has been suspended from the > department since February 2006, was arrested again in January for > allegedly impersonating a state trooper to obtain a prescription drug > from Berwick Hospital.> > "Random drug testing should be in everyone's policy the way things > are going," Chief Kane said.> > Police departments in Roaring Brook and South Abington Township have > been doing random drug testing for at least 15 years.> > "It keeps the police officers honest," Roaring Brook Police Chief > Kipp Adcock said. "If they know they're subject to drug testing, then > hopefully that will be a deterrent."> > South Abington Township Police Chief Robert Gerrity echoed Chief > Adcock's opinion.> > "Anyone operating police equipment should be subject to random > testing," he said. "Just to show that there's nothing illegal going > on with that police department."> > Dickson City can require an officer to take a drug test if Police > Chief William Stadnitski suspects the officer is under the influence > of drugs or alcohol. However, in the six years that stipulation has > been in the borough's police contract, it has never been used.> > "If an officer comes in and looks half-bombed out of his skull, then > the borough can request that officer be drug tested," he said. "The > results are only to be used for administrative purposes and not > criminal purposes."> > The Allentown Police Department had performed random drug testing for > more than 10 years, Police Chief Roger MacLean said. Allentown also > tests its officers in the vice unit, all potential hires and even > officers who get promoted within the department.> > "We've run many random drug tests and only ever came up with two > officers testing positive," Chief MacLean said. "I thought in today's > day and age, everyone would have it. I think it's a good thing to have."> > Archbald, Covington Township and Taylor police departments do not > have random drug testing. Neither do Wilkes-Barre or Erie, cities > that are similar in size to Scranton.> > Taylor Police Chief Steve Derenick supports random drug testing for officers.> > "I think in law enforcement, it should be required," he said. > "They're the ones enforcing the penal code."> > Liz Portelli, director of development and communication for Drug Free > Pennsylvania, insisted random drug testing should be mandatory for > police officers -- no exceptions.> > "Police officers should be role models for kids. You don't want your > police officers to be on drugs when they're on the job."> > ------------------------------> > Scranton Police Department drug testing policy:>

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home